Paternalism as a field of bioethical concern
Keywords:
paternalism, power, right, beneficence model, autonomy model, moral reason, informed consentAbstract
Paternalism becomes an issue in difficult situations when a physician in some way intentionally
affects and limits the decision-making autonomy of the patient. Even though paternalism
is literally interpreted as an attitude that appreciates paternal warmth, treating someone who
is not a child paternalistically means treating him wrongly. It is reasonable for people to regard
the respect of their rights as a protection against subjugation. If doing wrong to another person
is contrary to what I would do to myself, then I must admit that nonreversible behaviour
is wrong in itself. Whoever engages in nonreversible behaviour is doing wrong, or performing
an irrational act. Autonomy and rights belong to the key metaethical concepts because vulnerability
of all rational beings to subjugation is universal and our rational capacity to recognize
it establishes its primacy over other moral ideals. Vulnerability to subjugation is an intrinsic
qualification of human existence because every human being can harm the other. My duty
to be accountable for your vulnerability is implied in my power to harm you. In order not to
harm each other I must move from the logic of power, to the logic of duty. What makes selfish
action unethical is not that the agent has been a self centred paternalist only, yet the fact
that selfish interests have served as criteria for action. This paper aims to infer what sorts of
virtues are required to direct the physician to meet the interests of the patient as if they were
his own, just for the sake of moral reason which requires not to harm the other person. The
patient’s right to accept or refuse medical care changes the position of the physician’s power
over the patient because moral principles are those of reciprocity. Bioethical quest for a correct
method all moral agents ought to be guided by refers to the conviction that it is rational to
come as close as possible to the ideal moral judgment. Since a system of moral rules free of
conflicts between principles and exceptions to principles does not exist, physicians are constantly
confronted by conflicting demands in their need to decide what kind of consideration
is weightier. Since paternalism is against the informed consent, it insists that patients believe
in the doctor’s conscience and skill and act as the doctor tells them to do. If the physician acts beneficently to protect the patient from harm and the patient resists, the physician acts from
the perspective of medicine which violates the autonomy model. Bioethics aims to advance
human good because it provides a connection between goals of normative ethics and the
establishment of principles for handling violations of rationally grounded moral decisions.
Published
Issue
Section
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).